Forumotion on wiki

[DraMaTiK]

Greetings,

I think it would be a good idea to have Forumotion on Wikipedia.This would have access to more resources and especially the possibility of updates.Like any Wikipedia, everyone can contribute and provide more detailed information.This can increases the engine and is much more practical to search the forum support.


PS:Idea gotten from French Forum

~DraMaTiK

[Darren1]

DraMaTik, why do I get the feeling I know u from somewhere?

Anyway:
You are aware that because of Wiki's free edition of thread, it also allows u to make ur own section about each individual thing you would like.
Hence, you can make ur own page about ForuMotion.

[dragonintel]

but he might get yelled at.... i had this idea a lllooonnnggg time ago (me and Kilsek passed the idea back and forth) but didnt move forward.

Drag~

[Darren1]

but he might get yelled at.... i had this idea a lllooonnnggg time ago (me and Kilsek passed the idea back and forth) but didnt move forward.

Drag~

LOL
Well, no harm in trying right?

[Master Marc]

*Bravo!

It seems am the only one that voted on this poll,

Let's see the outcome of this.Who's willing to try it?

[MrMega]

DraMaTik, why do I get the feeling I know u from somewhere?

Lol darren. Hello, ForuMansion staff?

Anyway, I voted yes.

[Extreme_gsxf]

I voted YES but I think that a poll i needed. This is something what should be just started...

[Rehua]

Good idea, of course.

[Base]

I quite like this suggestion, so it's a yes from me.

[DraMaTiK]

Thank you for the votes guys
Anymore ?

[Walshy95]

Voted yes

[DraMaTiK]

Thanks for the vote Torres !

[Mehtevas]

I vote yes Drama

[DraMaTiK]

Thanks for the vote Kinko
Anymore ??

[Cornelia]

You should wait until a staff member reply.

And I just want to warn about the fact that one of Wikipedia's rules regarding article is that any article must be neutral.

I remember that one or two years ago, I typed "Forumactif" on the French Wikipedia website and the result told me that someone already tried to make an article, but it was deleted because it looked more like an advertisement than an actual neutral article.

Here's an example of article that looks like an advertisement : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisionfree

And one that is more neutral : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProBoards

[Base]

You should wait until a staff member reply.

And I just want to warn about the fact that one of Wikipedia's rules regarding article is that any article must be neutral.

I remember that one or two years ago, I typed "Forumactif" on the French Wikipedia website and the result told me that someone already tried to make an article, but it was deleted because it looked more like an advertisement than an actual neutral article.

Here's an example of article that looks like an advertisement : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisionfree

And one that is more neutral : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProBoards

That's actually quite a good point Cornelia. We need to write in a certain way so that it does not seem like we're advertising for this idea to actually go forward.

[Blofeld]

Voted yes could work.

[WhitePoint]

voted yes

[--kml--]

How about if i write?

[PrincessTyper]

I voted yes as well this would be grate if you have the right people doing it

Also Cornelia has a point if it looks to much like advertising we wont go any were with it will we .

[fall120]

good idea!

[Dumbledore27]

My vote goes for Yes.

Who's willing to try it?

I know for sure not me.

[Gramagamus Online]

I reckon I'd do a good job at sounding neutral. I vote yes.