Remove the warn of users who deserve it

I thought that members who are active and deserves this opportunity to have re-bar warnings

If they want unwarn he need respect thats options:

- No warn in last 2-3 months;
- To inform the board administrator who plagiarize forums on this forum or other existing support.

With this proposal loyal support forum members will benefit from removing warn. Messages accumulated so far will not be considered

Sorry but I think they won't allowed this sugggestion since it is already said on the General Rules.

Rules wrote: All bans and warnings are permanent.

And also i have done a search and this was said to MrMario to a user asked.

A User wrote:We all know specially those members who read the general rules that bans and warnings are permanent. So why are they permanent? Or why is warning being given to members permanent?

MrMario wrote:Because we don't want to hassle of remove warnings and bans at a period of time. If you got a ticket from a cop, you would see it on your record. Why would the ticket be removed after a period of time? The warning bar is a reminder to yourself/us to keep an eye out of our actions and what action to take.

I've seen this suggestion beeing rejected a fiew times. If I'm to consider it, the period for removing it would be much heigher & this

To inform the board administrator who plagiarize forums on this forum or other existing support.

would have no affect on your warning.

And also if they will reset the warning of those users it is very hard since there are thosands (i think) of members that will be resetted on their warning bars and a hard times on the admins...

Honestly, as the only person in the history of ForuMotion, and it's many other language counterparts, that has had their warning removed (EEeeh Caihlem ) I too am voting against this.

You should've read the rules, and if you had of obeyed them, then you wouldn't be warned, and you also would be able to reap the advantages of not being warned.

Anyway, bump

I'm going to against this as well. Members are warned after three reminders of the same offence. If after three reminders and the member is still misbehaving, then a warning is issued. Three reminders is enough, since they choose to continue.

It would be near impossible to keep track of every single member who has a warning on this forum and keep track of how long they've had it for. You can still be helpful even if you have warnings; they should not affect the quality of support you give.

Well, the reason I received a warning was for silly things that do not matter. And for 1 I never did even find out, so yes. The warning system could be fixed for sure.

Base wrote:I'm going to against this as well. Members are warned after three reminders of the same offence. If after three reminders and the member is still misbehaving, then a warning is issued. Three reminders is enough, since they choose to continue.

It would be near impossible to keep track of every single member who has a warning on this forum and keep track of how long they've had it for. You can still be helpful even if you have warnings; they should not affect the quality of support you give.

I agree with Base.
voted no

Anyway, bump

Hello,

Removing warnings because you deserve it or its been a long time since you been warned would take too much time and would be hard to keep up with. If you read the rules of the forum and respect them, you wouldn't have a warning. Warnings will remain as is.

=> Locked