should mods have the right to edit members signature's

Hi all just a little some thing i have looked over and found would be good to have on the site.
Right now the only way to edit a members signature is the member them self or a admin of the site with ACP rights.

i am asking you all to support me on having a place on the mods tools where the Mods can edit the signature's
this will help the staff when some one puts porn or some other thing in the signature that should not be there
This is a screen shot of a MCP that is on MyBB forum
as you can see you can stop the member from using the sig or just edit it


Screen shot Lost SORRY

right now the admins are the only ones that can do this ..

come on guys lets get this added to the site.

Its okay, but not the best Ideal I Heard. The best one is the Proper Warning System.

Voted yes, i don't think it will hurt to have this.

I have voted yes. This idea seems reasonable and it would definitely be less hassle for the admins if moderators can do this.

Thank you guys ....

keep the votes comming please

~Ape~

bump

Bump

I voted Yes, with being an Admin to a forum myself, it's a hassle stopping what you're doing and going through the ACP to change a Member's signiture if it violates the rules. If mods were to do this, Admins could get done with what they need to get done faster and not have to deal with setbacks like these.

Thank you for your vote

Yes please

Voted yes but I would modify a little detail...

It would be nice that Mods could turn off members signatures, but not edit them...

I will explain myself:

In that cases you spoke about (users wich uses signature to post porn images and so), it would be nice that Mods could turn off the users signature, I mean, desactivate that signature, but not edit it.

Because, if you say edit, you mean that Mods can enter into the user signature and modify the content...

I would like Mods could desactivate signatures, but not edit its content.

I would say yes,
But only if there is a real reason to.
like if it was to big or had a link in it you dint want in there and was not allowed on the forum.

Other then that signatures are supposed to be the members personal expression or something to share with every post, so you have to give them some flexibility to have something that fits them and shows their personality or things their interest..If you were to take that away, then my's well not even allow members to have them., so yes if there was realy something that had to be changed ,edited out, or Spammy, other then that there would be no reason to.

No please

invisible_fa wrote:Voted yes but I would modify a little detail...

It would be nice that Mods could turn off members signatures, but not edit them...

I will explain myself:

In that cases you spoke about (users wich uses signature to post porn images and so), it would be nice that Mods could turn off the users signature, I mean, desactivate that signature, but not edit it.

Because, if you say edit, you mean that Mods can enter into the user signature and modify the content...

I would like Mods could desactivate signatures, but not edit its content.

Yes that could be in the settings for the admin to put on or off if you wished.
Why i say edit is down to not all the signatures could have bad text,pic's or other so to edit and place a warning for bad stuff in there sig would be ok.

kirk wrote:I would say yes,
But only if there is a real reason to.
like if it was to big or had a link in it you dint want in there and was not allowed on the forum.

Other then that signatures are supposed to be the members personal expression or something to share with every post, so you have to give them some flexibility to have something that fits them and shows their personality or things their interest..If you were to take that away, then my's well not even allow members to have them., so yes if there was realy something that had to be changed ,edited out, or Spammy, other then that there would be no reason to.

there would have to be a reason for mods to edit the text in the 1st place and i would ask the mods to take a screen shot of the signatures before it was removed so the member can not say it was not true. or maybe add a report in there profiles in the comment part, you cold also have the right to let just one group of mods have the settings

Thank you all for your votes..

~Ape~

BUMP

Yep!

Hayley wrote:Yep!

THANK YOU Haley for your vote
come on guys vote please
and if you say no please say why not ..Thank you

Of course

Voted Yes

middo2 wrote:Of course

Chan wrote:Voted Yes

Thank you for your votes guys

yes , mods are there to help the admin but it seems i have to do everything you should have mods you trust so i cant see it doing any harm

~yes
There should be a special pick from the moderators though.

EDIT: I noticed two people voted for no. It wouldn't hurt to have this option, and if someone didn't want it, the administrators could simply check no for having it.

sounds like a good idea to me, i hate it when i need 2 webpages open, one for viewing my forum the other open in the acp

Voted Yes. I have had this issue on my forum with curse words (On a non-cursing forum) yet I was on holiday, and I was the only admin. So it remained until I returned, and the moderators could not edit it.

TOASTIE wrote:yes , mods are there to help the admin but it seems i have to do everything you should have mods you trust so i cant see it doing any harm

Suuki wrote:~yes
There should be a special pick from the moderators though.

EDIT: I noticed two people voted for no. It wouldn't hurt to have this option, and if someone didn't want it, the administrators could simply check no for having it.

lordraptor1 wrote:sounds like a good idea to me, i hate it when i need 2 webpages open, one for viewing my forum the other open in the acp

kamikay wrote:Voted Yes. I have had this issue on my forum with curse words (On a non-cursing forum) yet I was on holiday, and I was the only admin. So it remained until I returned, and the moderators could not edit it.

most forums have this for removing links, pic's, porn, flashing img's, and even curse words as kamikay has already said.

~Ape~

I voted yes.

If they are my moderators, I have already the trust placed in them to do things right. So I'd say yes, yet I find invisible_fa's suggestion excellent.

~Ape~

BUMP as this has not been bumped in so long

This is needed. Good idea. Mods don't have much power with regards to dealing directly with members (besides banning them).

Yes, but only if it was specific to certain usergroups.